twitter google

The internet is the future, duuuuuuuuuuh

Josh Gross (who just dumped SI and is now dating the slightly hotter but more aloof ESPN) talks more about the future of the UFC on the net:

UFC president Dana White talks about the Web as if it’s the eventual home of UFC pay-per-views, so much so that if he’s wrong he says he and his company are “screwed.” Sounds like a gamble for a guy who fancies wagering tens of thousands of dollars on blackjack. What’s Zuffa betting on? That web-based content is the future. That the promotion can survive and thrive without a broadcast or cable television partner. That it can find a way around sharing money with the nutty pay-per-view industry.
Why work in conjunction with a network or carrier when your brand is pervasive enough, your technology is capable enough, your intent is strong enough to strike out on your own? That question has to have been bandied about at Zuffa’s Las Vegas offices, if for no other reason than the quality of people working there would think of this stuff. Plus it makes sense.
When White talks about a UFC-dedicated channel, as he did in interviews last month, he very well could be referring to Web-housed content. Mixed martial arts, after all, survived online at a time when people like me would have given anything to watch free tape-delayed MMA on TV. Now it’s something to bitch about. In part, the sport reached this point because of its close link to the Internet and the explosion of social media like Facebook and Twitter, where White has 1.2 million followers. Unlike boxing, which is woven into the fabric of traditional sports media, MMA was and is empowered by a strong, activated online community. Traditional media is attempting to play catchup.

Would UFC fans pay 10 bucks a month for an xbox or playstation app that gives them access to a massive library of past events, prelims, and countdown shows? Oh, I dunno. We’re pretty damn stingy with our money. After all, only 300,000 people paid 45 bucks to buy that Mir vs Crocop card. We’d probably rather buy another 60 dollar shirt with rhinestones instead.

  • Tanhauser says:

    A lot of people only watch it online anyway. haha.

  • Reverend Clint says:

    this would never work for boxing since fans of that sport either are in a walker or wear perscription helmets. I would pay a monthly or years subscription to watch shit online… But only if it included ppv quality material. If its a buncha spike or euro trash shit plus old ass fights im not interested. Plus it would have to be in a good format or a good stream.

  • subo says:

    Yeah, if the Vault wasn’t shit I’d be all over it. Revamp it and I’m in.

  • Billytk says:

    I wouldn’t pay anything for online content, it’s bad enough staying under my providers bandwidth limits as it is watching ufc ppvs online instead of on cable just isn’t a option.

  • CAP says:

    How about a year or half year “subscription” for the ppvs. Kind of like the NFL Sunday Ticket or MLB package. Some discount incentive for ordering a block of events. I may be down for that.

  • Subbevil says:

    I wouldn’t pay ten bucks – or anything – a month for a subscription to online content, but I’d be crap-my-pants happy with a PS3 app for watching PPVs. I could finally release myself from the burden of cable companies…

  • Omomatta says:

    ^Buy a Roku. There’s a UFC Channel that links up with your subscription. If you have both, you can purchase ppv’s and stream them on your TV in HD.

  • frickshun says:

    ^^dis guy is pretty smardt.

  • P W says:

    “Buy a Roku.”

    What exactly is it that a Roku has that one of the other billion media players hasn’t?

  • Subbevil says:

    Fuck, Roku, Boxee, game consoles… why can’t the market just figure out how I’m going to do this TODAY?